Penelope Reed looks at where the law now stands on Quitclose trusts and knowing assistance
for breaches of trust
(taken from Issue No 20 – July 2002
Background
The recent decision of the House of Lords in Twinsectra Ltd. v Yardley and others1gave their Lordships the opportunity to clarify two very troubled and quite different areas of the law of trusts. The first was the nature of a Quistclose trust2, and the case undoubtedly introduces some clarity into this area. The second, quite distinct issue which their Lordships had to decide was the test of dishonesty required in relation to what has over the years become known as `knowing assistance`. In that area, the law has certainly been clarified, but somewhat unfortunately perhaps it is the strong dissenting judgement of Lord Millett which appears to reach the right result.
Login or register to continue reading.
It will only take a moment and youll get access to the TACT publications.
Please note, if registering a new account for the first time, this will require approval by a TACT member of staff before access is granted.
The Trust Quarterly Review is published in partnership with STEP, it discusses matters of interest to trustees and executors with a focus on the particular interests of trust corporations in mind
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OKREAD MORE